MORE DNA NEWS ON VAUGHANS

RE; NEWS: The Vaughan DNA site which our Vaughan's are a part of -- it continues to be updated with new DNA data, though there are no new additions to the 'Turquoise Group' which is our DNA type at the site, or the 'Green Group' which is the DNA of Ben Vaughan. Our Tuquoise group is the largest Vaughan group in the Vaughan DNA study and we are probably the most 'together' of the various groups. Our Turquoise group also is the only group on the site that has non-Vaughans included, though others would do the same if they were as 'together' as we are in finding information.
Aside from the fore-mentioned 'Green Group' our VP group is also responsible for several entries in the 'Orange Group' when we ran tests to see if Abraham Vaughan was related to our guys (and he wasn't).

 Ben Vaughan does not have William and John's Y-DNA but has instead the Y-DNA of Willards.  Many of you share in the desire to find out as we need to know if Ben himself was a son of a Willard or if it wasn't him at all but was James Vaughan who was the son of a Willard man.
 
It seem it was James who was the Willard, as there were Willards living close to the Callicotts in Prince Edward County, VA not too long before James was born, but can't prove this or disprove it without finding DNA samples of James and Martha's other sons to compare agains Bens' Y-DNA. 
 
 
If James' other sons match Ben's Y-DNA, that would mean either all of James sons were adopted or, much more likely, that James' Y-DNA was not the same as John's Y-DNA, and thus Nancy Callicott either had James by a Willard man before marrying John, or else John and Nancy adopted a Willard baby -- which is unlikely as Nancy was pretty young when she married John. (Would  a 'kid' know enough to raise another person's child when (at the time?) She had not even had one of her own yet.
 
Results for Ben's Y-DNA test came back some years back and they were not R1b1 like John and William's, but were R1a.  what happened? Where did this generation new genetic link come in?

RE: Eddie Davis Group of Genealogist
PHOTO: ROBERT WOODROW VAUGHAN

All comments are most welcomed!

No comments:

Post a Comment

By using the user comments form, you agree to the following:THESE remarks are not necessarily for this blog, but for all my blogs. So please dont be affended.
You will stay on topic.
You will not include links to websites and videos not associated with the topic.
You will not post the same comment multiple times.
You will not solicit anyone to buy or sell products or services, or to make donations of any kind. You will not include links to products in your comment.
You will not post anything libelous, defamatory, harmful, threatening, harassing, abusive, invasive of anothers privacy, hateful, racially or ethnically objectionable, or otherwise illegal.
You will not make threats to other users or people not associated with the site.
If you violate these rules, your post will be deleted.
Remember: you are a guest here. It is not censorship if you violate the rules and your post is deleted. All civilizations have rules and if you violate them you can expect to be ostracized from the tribe.